Cases 41 - 50 of 232
Fifth Third Bank, National Association v. Recleim, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank, National Association and Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Jon Stephen Bush, Recleim PA, LLC, Recleim SC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peskin et al v. Peachtree Investment Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, John Paul Barrie, Old Ivy Capital Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William R. Peskin and Mark Perkins
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Peterson v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware)
Plaintiff:
Ginger Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MADISON et al v. CITY OF ASHBURN
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson, Donald Maurice Madison Sr. and DONALD MAURICE MADISON, SR
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison Sr. et al v. City of Ashburn
as 2:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson and Donald Maurice Madison Sr.
Defendant:
City of Ashburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv00210
Defendant:
JUDGE CONNIE W JOHNSON and OFFICER DARRELL AMBOS
Plaintiff:
ADAM PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Stacy A. Peterson
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peterson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03999
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Della Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00356
Defendant:
OFFICER MCCOLLUMS, OFFICER PEAVY and WARDEN FORD
Plaintiff:
ADAM PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
SAMANTHA FORT and CONNIE W JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ADAM PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
