Cases 41 - 50 of 183
Ruha v. USPS Office of The Consumer Advocate
as 9:2017cv81193
Plaintiff:
Zsofia Ruha
Defendant:
USPS Office of The Consumer Advocate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-13467
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Advocate Law Group of Florida, P.A.
as 1:2016cv25379
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Advocate Law Group of Florida, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Owens v. The Advocator Group, LLC
as 6:2016cv02149
Plaintiff:
Keywee Owens
Defendant:
The Advocator Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Daleydebofsky abd Bryant, P.C.
as 8:2016mc00135
Plaintiff:
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC
Defendant:
Daleydebofsky and Bryant, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Advocate Networks, LLC v. Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00889
Plaintiff:
Advocate Networks, LLC
Defendant:
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruz v. Advocate Law Groups of Florida P.A.
as 1:2015cv24329
Plaintiff:
David Ruz
Defendant:
Advocate Law Groups of Florida P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holloman v. Honorable Kagasheki
as 2:2015cv14361
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Holloman
Defendant:
Honorable Kagasheki, ASK Advocates, Amine Suedi Kagasheki and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Collection Advocates,, et al
as 15-14437
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSUMER COLLECTION ADVOCATES, CORP., a Florida corporation and MICHAEL ROBERT ETTUS, individually and as an officer of Consumer Collection Advocates, Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv80925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
