Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv23722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Miller et al v. Cloud Solutions212, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03726
Plaintiff:
Natalia Burak, Natalia Brattceva, Victoria Miller and others
Defendant:
EWT Cloud Solutions, Inc., Carbon60 USA, Inc., Cloud Solutions212, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Henry-Bey v. Champery Real Estate 2015 LLC et al
as 9:2018cv80953
Defendant:
Carmela Bautisa, Hector Castro, Sherwood Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Henry-Bey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
PRH FAIRWINDS, LLC v. TEREX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation et al
as 0:2018cv61290
Plaintiff:
PRH FAIRWINDS, LLC
Defendant:
Terex Corporation , Maxim Crane Works LP , Terex Peiner GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PRH Paraiso Two, LLC et al v. MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P et al
as 1:2018cv22099
Plaintiff:
PRH Paraiso Two, LLC and PRH NE 31st Street, LLC
Defendant:
MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P., , TEREX CORPORATION and TEREX PEINER GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L&R Structural Corp., Inc. v. Maxim Crane Works, L.P.
as 1:2018cv21527
Plaintiff:
L&R Structural Corp., Inc.
Defendant:
Maxim Crane Works, L.P.
Counter_claimant:
Maxim Crane Works, L.P.
Counter_defendant:
L&R Structural Corp., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Emmanuel Maxime
as 17-15400
Petitioner:
In re: EMMANUEL MAXIME
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hammer v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 8:2016cv03533
Plaintiff:
Roseann Hammer
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
