Cases 61 - 70 of 89
DOOLEY v. 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02826
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DOOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOOLEY v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00705
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DOOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARBUCKLE et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02069
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY BROWN, AMY DAWN BEARD, JONATHAN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOOLEY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01051
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DOOLEY
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTCIAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Postula v. Dooley et al
as 1:2017cv24461
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Postula
Defendant:
Michael A. Dooley , James H. Holloran and Steven M. Piekara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
James R. Dooley
Defendant:
Kevin Scott Brown and TE Connectivity Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Judd et al
as 6:2017cv01496
Plaintiff:
Ian R. Stewart
Defendant:
Grady Judd and Darla Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Judd et al
as 8:2017cv02006
Plaintiff:
Ian R. Stewart
Defendant:
Grady Judd and Darla Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ann M. Dooley Trust v. Roth et al
as 0:2017cv60342
Plaintiff:
Ann M. Dooley Trust
Defendant:
Lucie L. Roth and John Douglas Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dooley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv00141
Petitioner:
Donald W. Dooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida, Grady C. Judd, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
