Cases 61 - 70 of 4,334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hill v. Tannex Development LC
as 4:2024cv10056
Plaintiff:
Allison Hill
Defendant:
Hotel Providers, Inc. and Tannex Development LC doing business as Opal Key Resort & Marina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bryant v. Swain et al
as 8:2024cv01384
Defendant:
Berry, Swain, Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Wallace Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafayette v. Owens et al
as 8:2024cv01383
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Lafayette, Sr., Keron Enslow, Florida Department of Revenue Child Support and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Lafayette, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'el v. State of Georgia, et al
as 24-11825
Defendant:
GRAY MUNICIPAL COURT, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, TIFFANY DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'el v. Attorney General, State of Texas, et al
as 24-11823
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'el v. Attorney General, State of Texas, et al
as 24-11824
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, STATE OF TEXAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Hill v. Officer Leo et al
as 9:2024cv80688
Defendant:
Absolute Immunity Immunity, Officer Leo, Rick L Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Demetrius Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
