Cases 61 - 70 of 161
JACKSON v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL JACKSON
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, ERIC SELLERS, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEABOLT v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
GARY SEABOLT
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, WILLIAM POWELL, JUNE BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Schrader et al
as 1:2017cv05104
Plaintiff:
Roy Daniels
Defendant:
Eric Schrader , Envision Property Management Services , James Logan Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Logan v. Life Ins. Co. of North America
as 1:2017cv04617
Plaintiff:
Gaye Logan
Defendant:
Life Ins. Co. of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hendley et al v. Garey et al
as 7:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS SMITH, JR and MICHAEL HENDLEY
Defendant:
PAUL LOGAN GAREY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CONNELLY v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
PATRICK LEE CONNELLY
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, BRUCE CHATMAN, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julien et al v. Georgia Board Of Dentistry et al
as 1:2017cv04045
Plaintiff:
Jessica Julien and Hollywood Smiles Atl, LLC.
Defendant:
Georgia Board Of Dentistry, Tanja D. Battle, Steve Holcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RODRIGUEZ v. CLUPPER et al
as 5:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
DEREK CLUPPER , MICHAEL KYLES , WILLIAM POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. CHATMAN et al
as 5:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
WILLIAM POWELL , RUFUS LOGAN , DEREK CLUPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bank of New York Mellon v. Begley et al
as 1:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Thomas Orlando Begley, Jr. , Adrian Jaymes , The United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
