Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Estrada-Monzon v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jaime L. Estrada-Monzon
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Gonzalez and Rosemary I. Melville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv24269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv02243
Petitioner:
Ramon Luis Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. TRW Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv23023
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez and Luis Gonzalez
Defendant:
TRW Contracting, Inc. and Felix C. Escalona
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cabral v. Lakes Cafe Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv21128
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Cabral
Defendant:
Lakes Cafe Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., Jose Gutierrez and Luis Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gonzalez et al v. Canal Management, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00575
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez, Elaine Guzman, Gustavo Lopez and others
Defendant:
Canal Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzalez-Mendez et al v. Wm. G. Roe & Sons, Inc.
as 8:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Gonzalez-Mendez, Jorge Luis Gonzalez-Mendez, Rafael Carcamo-Garcia and others
Defendant:
Wm. G. Roe & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv23370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Rueda v. TLC Grillers Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv21030
Plaintiff:
Diego Rueda
Defendant:
TLC Grillers Corporation and Luis Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
United States of America v. Gonzalez
as 4:2007mi00008
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Luis Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.