Cases 61 - 70 of 78
VICKERS v. RENZ
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY M VICKERS
Defendant:
MEL RENZ
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STRATIENKO v. TWIEST et al
as 1:2008mc00032
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER A STRATIENKO
Defendant:
MEL TWIEST, V STEPHEN MONROE JR, MITCHELL L MUTTER and others
STRATIENKO v. TWIEST et al
as 1:2008mc00033
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER A STRATIENKO
Defendant:
MEL TWIEST, V STEPHEN MONROE JR, MITCHELL L MUTTER and others
Crouch v. Adelman et al
as 4:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Sam Edward Crouch
Defendant:
David Adelman, Robert G Johnston, III, Mel Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abele v. Noah
as 8:2008cv01033
Plaintiff:
Mel Abele
Defendant:
Douglas Noah
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Crochet et al
as 1:2007cv23361
Plaintiff:
Mel Harris and Mel Harris
Defendant:
Troy Crochet, Troy Crochet, Troy Crochet and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Troy Crochet and Billy Ray, Jr.
ThirdParty Defendant:
New Viasys Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Franklin et al v. Votypka et al
as 0:2007cv61848
Plaintiff:
Mercedes J. Franklin, Mercedes J. Franklin, David Gantt and others
Defendant:
Mary Jane Votypka and Mel Ltd., LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Franklin et al v. Votypka et al
as 1:2007cv61848
Plaintiff:
Mercedes J. Franklin, Mercedes J. Franklin, David Gantt and others
Defendant:
Mary Jane Votypka and Mel Ltd., LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Harris v. Charys Holding Company, Inc.
as 1:2007cv22939
Plaintiff:
Mel Harris and Mel Harris
Defendant:
Charys Holding Company, Inc. and Charys Holding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Klayman v. Freedom's Watch, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv22433
Plaintiff:
Larry Klayman
Defendant:
Freedom's Watch, Inc., Bradley Blakeman, Ari Fleischer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
