Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Terrell v. Owens et al
as 5:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Terrell
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Samuel S. Olens, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Owens et al
as 1:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Willie Terrell
Defendant:
Brian Owens, GDC, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Pineiro v. Secretary, DOC
as 12-10083
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO PINEIRO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Goepp et al
as 6:2011cv01746
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Iraida Pinero Goepp, Francis E. Pineiro Garcia, Robert C. Goepp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Pineiro v. Pizzorni et al
as 1:2011cv23249
Plaintiff:
Yaritza Mercedes Pineiro
Defendant:
Alessandro Pizzorni and Ana Claudia Marques-Matos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pineiro et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2011cv21628
Plaintiff:
Maria Antonia Pineiro and Jose Pineiro Jr.
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pineiro v. Buss
as 1:2011cv20508
Plaintiff:
Francisco Pineiro
Defendant:
Edwin G. Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company v. Pineiro & Byrd PLLC et al
as 9:2010cv81611
Plaintiff:
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pineiro & Byrd PLLC and The Center of Bonita Springs, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Pineiro & Byrd PLLC
Counter_defendant:
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Granda v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
Paulino Granda
Defendant:
Scott Middlebrooks, Michael Pineiro, Jeffrey Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Welch v. McNeil et al
as 3:2010cv00959
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Welch
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Mr. Riska, Danica M. Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
