Cases 61 - 70 of 1,058
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 23-14053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Scherer v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv02383
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Scherer, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Yi v. Department of Justice
as 6:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Jin Mee Yi
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. KIA America, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv05377
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
KIA America, Inc, KIA Motors, KIA Motors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yi v. Department of Justice
as 6:2023cv02155
Plaintiff:
Jin Mee Yi
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
