Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Chapple v. Unum Group
as 6:2014cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Ann Chapple
Defendant:
Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HAWKINS v. UNUM GROUP
as 5:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
JOHN R HAWKINS
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Courington v. UNUM Group et al
as 8:2014cv00605
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Courington
Defendant:
UNUM Group and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wadsworth v. Unum Group (CONSENT)
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Wadsworth
Defendant:
Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Courington v. UNUM Group et al
as 2:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Courington
Defendant:
UNUM Group and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conard v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2013cv00896
Plaintiff:
Robin Conard
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America , Unum Group Corporation and Harrison Hospital Holdings LLC Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Smith v. National Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv03784
Plaintiff:
Jan L. Smith
Defendant:
National Life Insurance Company , UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hepp v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2013cv02836
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Hepp, M.D.
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company , Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and The Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damsker v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 8:2012cv02388
Plaintiff:
Lee S. Damsker
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and UNUM Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Roper v. Unum Group Corporation
as 1:2012cv00662
Plaintiff:
Royce Roper
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
