Cases 71 - 77 of 77
Boggy v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
as 0:2008cv61198
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Boggy and Robert Michael Boggy
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 1:2007cv02366
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Monaco Coach Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Reeves v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv61264
Plaintiff:
Jackie Reeves and Jackie Reeves
Defendant:
American Optical Corporation, American Optical Corporation, Aqua-Chem, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. Amercable,Inc et al.
as 0:2007cv60497
Plaintiff:
Deborah Thomas and Robert L. Thomas
Defendant:
Amercable,Inc, American Optical Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Wendt, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 6:2001cv00680
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ona Wendt, Dawn Ackerman, Harold Ackerman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Terrence M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Ellenburg, et al v. Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00153
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ditmar Wendt, Connie Dickinson, Alma Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
