Cases 71 - 80 of 168
LOCK v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00189
Petitioner:
DAVID A LOCK
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH and CHARLES CRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRICE v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY PRICE
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTENS v. HALLEY et al
as 3:2007cv00323
Petitioner:
STEPHEN M MARTENS
Respondent:
CHARLES HALLEY and JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. McDonough et al
as 9:2007cv80673
Plaintiff:
Dennis Leon Arnold
Defendant:
James R. McDonough, State Of Florida and Attorney General of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hardwick v. Bryant et al
as 3:2007cv00646
Plaintiff:
John Gary Hardwick, Jr., John Gary Hardwick, Jr., John Gary Hardwick, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Randall Bryant, James R. McDonough and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00168
Petitioner:
TASAVION BUTLER
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00134
Petitioner:
DAVID CASON
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GASKIN v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00165
Petitioner:
LEON P GASKIN
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00166
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
