Cases 71 - 80 of 123
Muhammad v Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2013cv01587
Plaintiff:
Askari Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , John Palmer , Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv01390
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Fitzgerald Howard, Renaldo Nixon and Donnie Leon Thomas
Defendant:
John Palmer and M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv01281
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ward
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, Asst. Warden Brad White Head, Sgt. Kyle Grandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORE v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
MARS L GORE
Defendant:
RICHARD L SCOTT, STATE OF FLORIDA, JOHN PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN POYCK v. PALMER
as 1:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VAN POYCK
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Logan v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
James Alexander Logan
Defendant:
Stephens Johnson, Andrew Johnson, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. John Palmer, et al.
as 3:2013cv00433
Petitioner:
Joe Elton Nixon
Respondent:
Michael D. Crews and John Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdool v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dane P Abdool
Defendant:
John Palmer and Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brant v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Brant
Defendant:
John Palmer and Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Palmer et al
as 5:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Fred Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
John Palmer and Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.