Cases 71 - 80 of 121
MARTS v. BELL et al
as 4:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY MARTS
Defendant:
FRANK BELL, GARY LEE BERGASH, KARL WAYNE LABERTEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUITER v. JOHN DOE I et al
as 7:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SUITER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II and JOHN DOE III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. AEW Capital Management, LP et al
as 1:2013cv01509
Plaintiff:
Marnetta Swan
Defendant:
AEW Capital Management, LP , Jasmine Woodlands, LLC , John Doe (Gary) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cohran v. Camden County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Herbert Leon Cohran , Jr.
Defendant:
Camden County Sheriff's Office , Charles F. McPhearson , Daniel O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Conifer Revenue Cycle Solutions, LLC et al
as 0:2012cv62322
Plaintiff:
Monica J. Dennis
Defendant:
Conifer Revenue Cycle Solutions, LLC , Delray Medical Center, Inc. , John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Turner v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 4:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Turner
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 4:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Patricia Turner
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodman v. Graham et al
as 4:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Goodman
Defendant:
James E. Graham, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Graham et al
as 6:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Goodman
Defendant:
James E. Graham, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
