Cases 71 - 80 of 122
Lewis v. Kellner et al
as 3:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Henry Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
William M Kellner, Barbara Harris, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Shaw v. Henry County Drug Court Program et al
as 1:2012cv03742
Plaintiff:
Micha Raynell Shaw
Defendant:
Henry County Drug Court Program, Flint Circuit Public Defenders Office, McDonough Probation and others
JOHNSON v. HINSON et al
as 5:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JIM HINSON, DODGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DODGE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. HINSON et al
as 3:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JIM HINSON, DODGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DODGE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. HINSON et al
as 5:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY DOUGLAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JIM HINSON, DODGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DODGE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Public Defenders Office
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lacinda Ann Davis
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Georgia Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Georgia Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Chisolm, et al
as 4:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Hamilton
Defendant:
Steve Brown, Larry Chisolm, James F. Bass, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Pilgrim et al
as 3:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Douglas Barber, Jr.
Defendant:
Mac Pilgrim and Carroll County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dollar v. Cauble et al
as 3:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Dollar
Defendant:
Charles B. Cauble, Newnan Public Defender's Office and Coweta County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
