Cases 81 - 90 of 320
Vinodh Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor Correctional
as 20-14680
Respondent / Appellee:
TAYLOR CI WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Ismael Ortiz v. Madison CI Warden, et al
as 20-14586
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAHAM, Captain, STALNAKER, Sergeant at Madison Correctional Institution, S. BEARDEN, Assistant Warden at Madison Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ
Vinodh Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor CI
as 20-14584
Respondent / Appellee:
TAYLOR CI WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
John Wilson, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-14355
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ZEPHYRHILLS CI WARDEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DAVID WILSON, JR.
Lee v. Dr. Blackman et al
as 3:2020cv01196
Defendant:
Sumter CI, Warden A. Baldridge, Food Service Director Jhon Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Gaffney v. Taylor CI Warden, et al
as 20-13572
Defendant / Appellee:
FRAN WOOD, Assistant Warden of Taylor Correctional Institution in her individual and official capacity, TAYLOR CI WARDEN, GRUBBS, Sergeant security of Taylor Correctional Insitution in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY RAY GAFFNEY
RAGHUBIR V. WARDEN CROSS CITY CI ET AL
as 1:2020cv00227
Defendant:
TAYLOR CI, FDLE, TAYLOR COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. Warden Cross City CI et al
as 6:2020cv01655
Defendant:
F.D.L.E., Medical Staff D.O.C., D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Stephens v. Columbia CI Warden
as 20-13374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA CI WARDEN
David Stephens v. Warden Columbia C.I.
as 20-13375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA CI WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
