Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Rofila v. United States Of America, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00010
Plaintiff: Martin Rofila
Defendant: United States Of America and Immigration & Custom Enforcement (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ice Services, LLC v. Regal Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mi00001
Plaintiff: Ice Services, LLC
Defendant: Regal Marketing, Inc., Regal Marketing, LLC, W.G. Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00226
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De Varona v. U.S. Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00160
Petitioner: Enrique De Varona
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General , Department of Homeland Security , U.S. ICE Field Office Director for the Miami Field Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mounkassa v. DHS/ICE
as 1:2017cv04553
Petitioner: Adolphe Mounkassa
Respondent: DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00220
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00156
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KWABENA v. FOLKSTON ICE PROCESSING CENTER
as 4:2017cv00203
Plaintiff: ASARE KWABENA
Defendant: FOLKSTON ICE PROCESSING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arango v. ICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00112
Petitioner: Abraham Rene Arango
Respondent: ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acharya v. Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
as 5:2017cv00096
Petitioner: Ganesh Acharya
Respondent: Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?