Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Patricia Burthe et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc et al
as 1:2017cv03298
Plaintiff:
Patricia Burthe and Darrell Burthe
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Ethicon Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tedford v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv03254
Plaintiff:
Bill Tedford
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tedford v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
Bill Tedford
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burl v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv02315
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Burl
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon and Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodson v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv02232
Plaintiff:
Gary Goodson
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heather Haug, et al v. Johnson and Johnson, et al
as 1:2017cv02231
Plaintiff:
Heather Haug and John Haug
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson , Inc. Ethicon and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cisco v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 7:2016cv01195
Plaintiff:
Leigh Cisco
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldthrip et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Maeola Goldthrip and Vickie Goldthrip
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldthrip et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Maeola Goldthrip and Vickie Goldthrip
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brazil v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
Paula Brazil
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson and Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
