Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Duffy v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, et al
as 1:2008mi00216
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Duffy
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, et al
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45 Subpoena
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv21581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv60511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROWE v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
HOPE ROWE
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv61926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Duffy v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
as 1:2007cv00888
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Duffy and Laura Ann Duffy
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Pride v. Laboratory Corporation of America et al
as 5:2007cv01878
Plaintiff:
Henry Craig Pride
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America, International Paper Company and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
