Cases 81 - 90 of 281
David Carpenter v. Razza Horta, et al
as 20-10023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID CARPENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
R. GRICE, Sargeant of Yard Correctional Officer, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (TALLAHASSEE), CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, "Medical" Department of Corrections and others
TAYLOR v. DOE et al
as 5:2019cv00512
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Bibb County Jail and DOE
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DAUNE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smola v. Ogaga
as 8:2019cv02938
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Smola
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriff Office, Naphcare Medical Department, Ogaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex Coleman-Medium, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
TAIR v. FORD, et al
as 5:2019cv00426
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and WARDEN FORD
Plaintiff:
DEMARCO A TAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Jackson v. Florida Department of Corr., et al
as 19-13743
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTURION MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, DENIS VILCHEZ, M.D., MD, LEE BROWN, M.D., MD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG A. JACKSON
Tair v. Ford
as 3:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
Demarco A. Tair
Defendant:
Warden Ford and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackey v. Department of Corrections Medical Department
as 1:2019cv23686
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Deyansa Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rial v. Trueba et al
as 5:2019cv00413
Defendant:
J Johnson, FNU Banks, FNU Lugo and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Rial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith Diamond Dutch v. Rugby Dandruff Shampoo et al
as 1:2019cv03640
Defendant:
Rugby Dandruff Shampoo and DeKalb County Jail Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Brittani Emanuel Billionaire Car Smith Diamond Dutch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
