Cases 1 - 10 of 975
NELSON v. TOWN OF SNEADS FLORIDA et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NELSON
Defendant:
TOWN OF SNEADS FLORIDA and ALTON RANEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELSON v. TOWN OF SNEADS FLORIDA et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NELSON
Defendant:
TOWN OF SNEADS FLORIDA and ALTON RANEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel v. Department Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Department Homeland Security, State of Rhode Island, Boston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHEWMAKER et al v. YARDI SYSTEMS INC et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
BALACIANO GROUP, YARDI SYSTEMS INC, ALCO MANAGEMENT INC and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON SHEWMAKER and JAMAAR FAISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pureo Natural Products LLC, et al v. Danielle Townes, et al
as 24-11819
Plaintiff:
PUREO NATURAL PRODUCTS LLC and TRENDZ BEAUTY ACADEMY LLC
Defendant:
DANIELLE TOWNES and LOCN PRODUCTS LLC
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison Breedlove, et al v. Demetry Christian
as 24-11579
Plaintiff:
HARRISON BREEDLOVE, HAAKON BREKKE, CONNOR SMITH and others
Defendant:
DEMETRY CHRISTIAN
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
114 East Ocean LLC v. Town of Lantana, Florida
as 9:2024cv80599
Plaintiff:
114 East Ocean LLC
Defendant:
Town of Lantana, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
