Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ARMBRUST v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22173
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARMBRUST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Bryant Keith Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Major Crawford, Assistant Warden Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMBRUSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54233
Plaintiff:
HOWARD ARMBRUSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMBRUSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53516
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARMBRUSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMBRUSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28998
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ARMBRUSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Hall et al
as 3:2020cv01125
Defendant:
William R. Hall, L. Thompson, A. McGregor and others
Plaintiff:
Devandal Bernard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMBRUSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84358
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ARMBRUSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMBRUSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52132
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARMBRUSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMBRUSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02571
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARMBRUSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03215
Plaintiff:
RYAN COOPER, ERIC VIHINEN, JOSEPH TOPPING and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
