Cases 1 - 10 of 208
NIZIOLEK v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS NIZIOLEK
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., EzriCare, LLC and EZRIRX,LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Greenberg
as 0:2024cv61035
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
JADUE v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22106
Plaintiff:
SERGIO JADUE
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., AMAZON STUDIOS, LLC, AMAZON VIDEO BRASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Booker v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Booker
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., American Zurich Insurance Co., Sedgwick Claims Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - E.R.I.S.A
Norman v. Amazon Payments Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01012
Defendant:
Amazon Payments Inc., Amazon.com Inc, Corporation Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
Evanthony R. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott Dubose v. Amazon
as 24-11207
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL DUBOSE
Defendant:
AMAZON and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amin, M.D. v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dr. Mahendra Amin, M.D.
Defendant:
Rachael O'Brien, Morbid: A True Crime Podcast LLC doing business as Morbid Network, Wondery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
