Cases 1 - 10 of 36
HORVAT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14692
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL HORVAT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ERIC THOMAS HALL
Defendant:
SCOTTY RHODEN, ANDREW PAUL THAMES and JASON REEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18502
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAME v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10675
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL ADAME
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Friese v. Paul
as 6:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Reddick Friese
Defendant:
Andrew Paul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
PAUL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19589
Plaintiff:
TYLER ANDREW PAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IDOL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16149
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL IDOL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLTKAMP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16123
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL LEE HOLTKAMP, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCGOVERN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57271
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL MCGOVERN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
