Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Corporation Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
GUZMAN-GOMEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32141
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GUZMAN-GOMEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman v. Superior Court of Gwinnett et al
as 1:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Guzman
Respondent:
Superior Court of Gwinnett, Patsy Gatson and Gwinnett Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Superior Court Gwinnett Co et al
as 1:2021cv02531
Defendant:
Superior Court Gwinnett Co and District Attorney Patsy Gatson
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Guzman Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GUZMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45716
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUZMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40635
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guzman-Valencia v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Pedro Antonio Guzman-Valencia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Pedro Guzman-Valencia
as 16-14918
Petitioner:
In re: PEDRO ANTONIO GUZMAN-VALENCIA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raul Guzman-Dearco v. USA
as 13-13882
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL ANTONIO GUZMAN-DEARCO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Guzman-Dearco v. USA
as 8:2013cv01961
Plaintiff:
Raul Antonio Guzman-Dearco
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
