Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Brenneman v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 3:2023cv11293
Defendant:
Richard Brenneman, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRENNEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72192
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BARTHOLOMEW WILLIAM BRENNEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRENNEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27236
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BRENNEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRENNEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72540
Plaintiff:
KURT BRENNEMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Bennek, et al v. F. Ackerman, et al
as 16-17742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY LOU BENNEK and CORA FROHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
F. DUANE ACKERMAN, ARI BOUSBIB, GREGORY D. BRENNEMAN and others
:
SERVICE
In re: Douglas Brenneman
as 16-14831
Petitioner:
In re: DOUGLAS BRENNEMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brenneman v. United States Of America
as 4:2016cv10050
Plaintiff:
Douglas Brenneman
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brenneman v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Christina Hatfield Brenneman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brenneman v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04517
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Brenneman
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
