Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran, Strike Officer Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran and Strike Officer Hollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadet v. Deputy et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
BabyLove Cadet
Defendant:
Hardman Edward Deputy and Camden County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Eric Cadet
as 24-10048
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC CADET
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CADET v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02604
Plaintiff:
COREY CADET
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cadet v. Target Corporation
as 3:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Chelo Cadet
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores #669
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CADET v. WHEATON et al
as 3:2023cv17134
Plaintiff:
MIKE CADET
Defendant:
WHEATON, WHITE, BURDETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frusner v. Epic Landscaping Inc et al
as 0:2023cv61195
Plaintiff:
Cadet Frusner
Defendant:
Epic Landscaping Inc, Epic Plants Nursery LLC and Franz Collier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cadet v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 9:2023cv80712
Plaintiff:
Kerlyne Cadet
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Karen Sitero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
