Cases 1 - 10 of 909
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NetChoice, LLC v. Carr
as 1:2024cv02485
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. Freeman et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Lamorris Carr
Defendant:
Charles David Freeman and R J Expert Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Carr v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Keith Carr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Kyrima Anderson, Patrick A. Long, II and Kyrimas Heirs Trust
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher Carr, John F. King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. CARR
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
