Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PARHAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MANDRELL PARHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN and CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN, CESAR SISKA and DOCTOR CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. CORRECT CARE INTEGRATED HEALTH et al
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
BARRY LYNN GIBSON
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE INTEGRATED HEALTH, CHARLES COLEMAN and DR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnny Mcgill v. Riverbend Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-11245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC, CHARLES COLEMAN and others
CLAY v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE CLAY
Defendant:
Nurse ADAM MARTIN and CHARLES COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant:
RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, CHARLES COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Charles Coleman
as 22-13095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES COLEMAN
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67033
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COLEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12713
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
