Cases 1 - 10 of 32
GILBERT v. TRUMP et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
as 4:2018cv00516
Petitioner:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent:
FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilbert v. South Florida Evaluation & Treatment Center
as 1:2018cv23086
Defendant:
South Florida Evaluation & Treatment Center
Plaintiff:
Craig Ivan Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. United States Attorney Southern District of Florida et al
as 1:2018cv22368
Plaintiff:
Craig Ivan Gilbert
Defendant:
United States Attorney Southern District of Florida, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2017cv62084
Plaintiff:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Defendant:
Robert Gibson, State of Florida, Ari Porth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GILBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2017cv00234
Petitioner:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, MICHAEL CARROL, BROWARD COUNTY JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GILBERT v. NORTH FLORIDA EVALUATION TREATMENT CENTER
as 1:2017cv00229
Defendant:
NORTH FLORIDA EVALUATION TREATMENT CENTER
Plaintiff:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Craig Gilbert
as 17-10922
Petitioner:
In re: CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Craig Gilbert v. State of Florida, et al
as 17-10615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DCF NFETC, GEORGE R. WILLIAMS, Psychiatrist, JOE INFANTINO, NFETC Administrator and others
Craig Gilbert v. Administrator, South Florida E, et al
as 17-10494
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTH FLORIDA EVALUATION AND TREATMENT CENTER, Bob Quam, JEFFREY LEVENSON, Broward County Judge, ARI PORTH, Broward County Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
