Cases 1 - 10 of 2,017
MONTGOMERY v. DIXON
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 0:2024cv61642
Plaintiff:
ERIC MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00417
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Dixon
as 1:2024cv23375
Petitioner:
John Aaron Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary Ricky D Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morriss v. DIXON
as 0:2024cv61624
Plaintiff:
Robert Morriss
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILDER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
ANTONIOUS WILDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00889
Petitioner:
Devin Bartley
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEBER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00144
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Petitioner:
BRYAN ARTHUR WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00145
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Plaintiff:
TERRY T DAVIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Narvaez v. Dixon
as 0:2024cv61545
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon
Petitioner:
Albert Enrique Narvaez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KROFT v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00324
Defendant:
BURKE, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.