Cases 1 - 10 of 46
CLARK v. COWEN et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOUIS CLARK
Defendant:
DOCTOR COWEN and DOCTOR FYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41751
Plaintiff:
TANNER G FYE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fye v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv14083
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Fye, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Braja Smith v. Fye, et al
as 20-14191
Defendant / Appellee:
FYE, MD, Chief Physician at Macon State Prison, MACON SP WARDEN and CLARENCE KEGLER, Unit Manager, Macon State Prison
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAJA SMITH
Robert Clark v. Chiquita Fye, et al
as 20-11020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA A. FYE, in her official and individual capacity as Medical Director of Macon State Prison and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Macon State Prison
FYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27045
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19965
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN PAUL FYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Clark v. Chiquita Fye, et al
as 19-12928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA A. FYE, in her official and individual capacity as Medical Director of Macon State Prison and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Macon State Prison
Clyde Holland v. Warden, et al
as 19-11349
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBINSON, MACON SP WARDEN and FYE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE FRANKLIN HOLLAND
USA v. Richard Fye, III
as 19-10903
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE FYE, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
