Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04489
Plaintiff: John Doe 1
Defendant: Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jane Doe 1 et al v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00788
Plaintiff: Jane Does 1, and 2 by and through their mother, Mary Doe, and Jane Doe 3, by and through her father, Joseph Doe, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant: Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jane Doe 2 by and through her mother, Mary Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv02147
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 2 by and through her mother, Mary Doe
Defendant: Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1 by and through her mother, Mary Doe and Jane Doe 3 by and through her father, Joseph Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
U.S. All Star Federation, Inc. v. Open Cheer & Dance Championship Series, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv02135
Counter Defendant: U.S. All Star Federation, Inc. and Varsity Spirit, LLC
Defendant: Open Cheer & Dance Championship Series, LLC doing business as Allstar Worlds Championship/Allstar Worlds, The Open Cheer and Dance, LLC doing business as Allstar Worlds Championship/Allstar Worlds, David Owens and others
Not Classified By Court: Matulis Mediation | Arbitration
Counter Claimant: Open Cheer & Dance Championship Series, LLC and The Open Cheer and Dance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044 Trademark Infringement
Jane Doe 3 by and through her father, Joseph Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv02149
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 3 by and through her father, Joseph Doe
Defendant: Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Byte Federal, Inc. v. Lux Vending LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00102
Plaintiff: Byte Federal, Inc.
Defendant: Lux Vending LLC a limited liability company doing business as Bitcoin Depot
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jane Doe 1 by and through her mother, Mary Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv02146
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1 by and through her mother, Mary Doe
Defendant: Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-13104
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT M. SPEER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Army, DOUGLAS LAMONT, in his official capacity as senior exercising the functions of the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Army for Civil Works and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Intervenor / Appellee: ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, CITY OF ATLANTA, CITY OF GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA and others
National Wildlife Federation, Inc., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-13444
Plaintiff / Appellant: APALACHICOLA BAY AND RIVER KEEPER, INC., NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?