Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Hendley v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05610
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Hendley
Defendant:
Centene Corporation, Centene Management Company LLC and Ambetter of Peach State, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HENDLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv15015
Plaintiff:
ERIC BERNARD HENDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
HENDLEY WILDER
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC, LIFE LINE HOME CARE SERVICES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brian M. Casey v. Captain Lee, et al
as 22-11237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN LEE, SGT. BOSTIC, D PORTER and others
Hendley v. The United States of America
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eric Hendley
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Casey v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Captain Lee, Sgt. Bostic, D. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Dixon et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Colonel Hendley and Sgt. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Colonel Hendley and Sgt. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2021cv05333
Plaintiff:
Hendley Wilder
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC, Life Line Home Care Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
