Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
St Charles v. Immigration Court et al
as 1:2020cv22289
Defendant:
Office DHS and Immigration Court
Plaintiff:
Wilmax St Charles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aceituno v. Harrison Police Dept. et al
as 4:2019cv01758
Respondent:
ICE, Harrison Police Dept., Immigration Court and others
Petitioner:
Dario Aceituno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. United States Immigration Court
as 3:2018cv01431
Respondent:
United States Immigration Court
Petitioner:
Troy Vandal Gregory King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cox v. Immigration Court
as 9:2018cv80823
Defendant:
Immigration Court
Plaintiff:
Rodney Milton Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv21347
Plaintiff:
Junior Robinson
Defendant:
The United States of America , Krome Immigration Court and ICE/DHS Office of the Chief Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv22791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Merilien v. U. S. Citizenship / INS District Director of GA et al
as 1:2012cv03792
Petitioner:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Respondent:
U. S. Citizenship / INS District Director of GA and Immigration Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv22163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BLOODWORTH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAMAR BLOODWORTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
