Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ROBERTS v. WEBB et al
as 3:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAMES R WEBB, C SIMMONS and T ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Webb v. USA
as 21-10935
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES THOMAS WEBB
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Webb v. United States Of America
as 1:2020cv21522
Plaintiff:
James T. Webb
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Webb v. Robin Weiner
as 20-10441
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN R. WEINER, Trustee
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES THOMAS WEBB, Debtor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv63020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Securities and Exchange Commis v. James Webb
as 15-14374
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES THOMAS WEBB
Webb v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00088
Petitioner:
James D. Webb
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00410
Petitioner:
James D. Webb
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Webb et al
as 0:2007cv61655
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James Thomas Webb, Citirise Redevelopment, LLC, Citirise Redevelopment, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche AG et al v. Webb
as 1:2007cv01897
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche AG and Porsche Cars North America, Inc.,
Defendant:
James Clay Webb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
