Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wells v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
William Edward Wells, III
Defendant:
John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Kim Jackson
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Palmer and Travis Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
ROY O DANIELS
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS and JOHN PALMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Kim Jackson
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Palmer and Travis Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Sgt. T. Spradley et al
as 3:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Nelson
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Spradley, Capt. J. DiMarios, Sgt. Lineblaid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Kim Jackson
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Palmer and Travis Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YAWN v. PALMER et al
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUBREU YAWN and ANTHONY AUBREY YAWN
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, MALLOY, LAURA PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09627
Plaintiff:
JOHN PALMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YAWN v. MALLOY et al.
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUBREU YAWN
Defendant:
MALLOY, JOHN DOE, JOHN PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17533
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
