Cases 1 - 10 of 100
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04866
Plaintiff:
KIM MARIE RODRIGUEZ and EDWARD RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chung et al v. King
as 1:2026cv04186
Plaintiff:
Dae Kun Chung and Lina Kim
Defendant:
Jay Corey King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
KIM v. Grange Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv00137
Plaintiff:
HYOSUNG KIM
Defendant:
Grange Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue Generally
Kim v. Dongwon Autopart Technology Georgia, LLC
as 3:2026cv00150
Plaintiff:
Donghyun Kim
Defendant:
Dongwon Autopart Technology Georgia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
FEASTE v. PEAVY et al
as 5:2026cv00294
Plaintiff:
KIM RAYMOND FEASTE
Defendant:
SHERIFF STEVEN CRAIG PEAVY, LINDSAY ESCHENBACH, SHERIFF BRAD FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DAVIS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04642
Plaintiff:
KIM DAVIS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Janiver v. Kim et al
as 0:2026cv61818
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Janiver
Defendant:
Christine Kim, Chang Hak Kim, Suki Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kim v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv01387
Plaintiff:
Irene Kim
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
