Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13824
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAVELLE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93227
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAVELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01783
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State of Alabama, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrott v. Williams et al
as 1:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
Harvey Eugene Parrott
Defendant:
Donald Lavelle Williams, Jr. , Alexandria Freight Lines, Inc. and New York Marine and General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv02228
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
United States, Eric H Holder, Jr, PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Lavell Williams v. State of Alabama
as 2:2014cv01514
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01366
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Birmingham Jefferson County Commissioners et al
as 2:2013cv01594
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson County Commissioners, Carrington, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sanders, et al
as 5:2012cv02843
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Greg Sanders and Josh Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Clyde E Jones, Brandon K Falls, Anne Marie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
