Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SMERDELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02755
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH SMERDELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KUBBINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13887
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH KUBBINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GEORGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Singer Island Resort and Spa LLC et al
as 9:2020cv81488
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Keyser, Jr. and Singer Island Resort and Spa LLC
Plaintiff:
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
GREGOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82698
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH GREGOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAISSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH CHAISSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crandle v. Foxhall et al
as 1:2018cv01016
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Joseph Crandle, Jr.
Defendant:
Foxhall, Wilson, White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence Jefferson v. GDCP Warden
as 17-12160
Petitioner - Appellee:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH JEFFERSON
Respondent - Appellant:
GDCP WARDEN
In re: Lawrence Smith
as 13-13112
Petitioner:
In re: LAWRENCE JOSEPH SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Charlotte Taylor-Tillotson v. Montana Department of Public H
as 12-13068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE TAYLOR-TILLOTSON, on behalf of Lawrence Joseph Tillotson
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF VITAL RECORDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
