Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Shea et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Raymond Edward Shea, Pauline D. Shea, USA Health University Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Heather Loper v. Lifeguard Ambulance Services, LLC
as 21-90028
Petitioner:
HEATHER LOPER
Respondent:
LIFEGUARD AMBULANCE SERVICES, LLC
Esurance Property & Casualty Company v. Beasley et al
as 1:2019cv00404
Defendant:
William Stokes, Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company, J.L. Bedsole Rotary Rehabilitation Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Esurance Property & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Loper v. Lifeguard Ambulance Service LLC
as 2:2019cv00583
Plaintiff:
Heather Loper
Defendant:
Lifeguard Ambulance Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company v. Columbia Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02320
Plaintiff:
Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Columbia Enterprises LLC , Cole Beauchamp, Tracy Beauchamp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
DOYLE v. D&K SPORTSWEAR INC et al.
as 3:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DOYLE
Defendant:
D&K SPORTSWEAR INC and THE LIFEGUARD STORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Haffner et al v. Lifeguard Transportation Service Inc
as 2:2015cv00596
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cathy Haffner
Defendant:
Lifeguard Transportation Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
