Cases 1 - 10 of 67
LOAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03171
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARTIN LOAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Indian River Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2023cv14287
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Indian River Sheriff Office, Sheriff Deryl Loar, Deputy Christian Mathisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlton Jones v. Cynthia Roberts, et al
as 23-12919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON LEE JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA ROBERTS, JAMES BARKWELL, LAURA ZAPUTO and others
Holmes v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv14066
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Captain Kent Campbell, Sergeant Christian Mathisen and Sheriff Deryl Loar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergandi v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Petitioner:
Cali Bergandi
Respondent:
State of Florida, R. J. Larizza, Bruce Colten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenyon v. Loar et al
as 2:2021cv14445
Plaintiff:
Ward Lawrence Kenyon
Defendant:
Deryl Loar, Selby Strickland, Gary Silverman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56940
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41117
Plaintiff:
JEREMY B LOAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Loar et al
as 2:2021cv14275
Plaintiff:
Gentrus Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar, Indian River County Sheriff Department, Brandon Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Loar et al
as 2:2021cv14184
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar, Andrew Dean and Michael Scott
Plaintiff:
Charles Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
