Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Johnson v. Atteberry
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Atteberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonita v. U.S.P-Lee employees et al
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Eric Bonita
Defendant:
U.S.P-Lee employees, Lieutenant Hamilton, Lt. Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick Williams and Toby K. Fornshell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2023cv01452
Petitioner:
John M. Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04013
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03642
Plaintiff:
AARON M JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ALEXANDER, MICHAEL WAYNE ALLEN, ALAN ALSOP and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Fishley et al
as 3:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
Fishley, Donald Davis, W. Moniezun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
