Cases 1 - 10 of 39
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25924
Plaintiff:
MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12345
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Jackson
as 1:2020cv02550
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson
Plaintiff:
Maurice Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Young v. Gerald Theilen
as 15-13158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD O. THEILEN, Mail Collection Representative, Sumter CI
Darryl Young v. Easter Brook, et al
as 15-12331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG, and next of friend fellow prisoners (very important prisoners)
Defendant - Appellee:
EASTER BROOK, Office of Regional Inspector, MOORE, Bureau of Inmate Grievance Appeal, SOLANO, Bureau of Inmate Grievance Appeal and others
Darryl Young v. M. Solano, et al
as 15-11234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SOLANO, Bureau of Inmate Grievance Appeal, JENNIFER FOLSOM, Office of the Warden, TOMMY YOUNG, Office of the Warden and others
Young v. Brook et al
as 5:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Easter Brook, Moore, Solano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Young v. Gerald Theilen
as 15-10761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD O. THEILEN
Darryl Young v. James Williams, et al
as 15-10210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WILLIAMS, Food Service Director, LISA CATO, Lieutenant, JOE ROWE, Classification Officer and others
Darryl Young v. D. Hartsfield, et al
as 15-10079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
D. HARTSFIELD, SHARIEFF and BUREAU OF INMATE GRIEVANCE APPEALS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
