Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv23328
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20791
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Powell et al
as 6:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Bernice Powell, Betty Hodges Powell, Metlife Home Loans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bush et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2012cv03722
Plaintiff:
Dwayne A. Bush , Beverly F. Bush and Bush Family Revocable Living Trust
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , McCalla Raymer, LLC , Prommis Solutions, LLC. and others
Counter_claimant:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Counter_defendant:
Beverly F. Bush , Dwayne A. Bush and Bush Family Revocable Living Trust
Ali v. Metlife Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03461
Plaintiff:
Laila Ali
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans, Inc., Fulton County Marshall, State Court of Fulton County and others
Wright et al v. Metlife Home Loans
as 1:2012cv01968
Plaintiff:
Marrex Wright and Gina Wright
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Metlife Home Loans v. Wright et al
as 1:2012cv00515
Defendant:
Marrex Wright and Gina E. Wright
Plaintiff:
Metlife Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charles v. Metlife Home Loans et al
as 1:2011cv03190
Plaintiff:
Serge Charles
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans and First Horizon Home Loan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jefferson v. Metlife Home Loans et al
as 1:2011cv01719
Plaintiff:
Sonya Anita Jefferson
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans , McCalla Raymer, LLC. and Prommis Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
