Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Knight et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00903
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knight, ZACHARY HUEY, BRYAN HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11465
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Michael Martin
as 23-11477
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL MONTAY MARTIN
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19968
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18645
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bergandi v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00917
Petitioner:
Cali Bergandi
Respondent:
State of Florida, Ron DeSantis, Michael D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2022cv80467
Plaintiff:
Michael R Martin
Defendant:
Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2022cv80466
Plaintiff:
Michael R Martin
Defendant:
Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J MARTIN
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57627
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
