Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Taylor v. MGA Logistics, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Barry C. Taylor
Defendant:
MGA Logistics, LLC and Mohamed Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv02207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Vernon v. Union Food Mart, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00923
Defendant:
Mohamed Alsahqani, Mohamed A. Alsahgani, Union Food Mart, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lashanta Vernon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elbiltagy v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2017cv00943
Petitioner:
Mohammed Ahmed Elbiltagy
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elbiltagy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2017cv00882
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ahmed Elbiltagy
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mohammed Elbiltagy v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-11755
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED ELBILTAGY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Elbiltagy v. Department of Homeland Security/DHS or ICE
as 3:2017cv00375
Petitioner:
Mohammed Ahmed Elbiltagy
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security/DHS or ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00020
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Elbiltagy v. Lynch et al
as 3:2016cv01542
Petitioner:
Mohammed Ahmed Elbiltagy
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Marc Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
