Cases 1 - 10 of 19
NICKOLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30923
Plaintiff:
BRAD NICKOLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sumpter v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Anthony Sumpter and Lajuan Sumpter
Defendant:
Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and Officer Nickols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESPINOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23909
Plaintiff:
NICKOLE LEE ANN ESPINOZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESPINOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23917
Plaintiff:
NICKOLE LEE ANN ESPINOZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Lewis (MAG+)
as 2:2023mc03997
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sade Nickole Lewis
MOONEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14497
Plaintiff:
NICKOLE MOONEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
NICKOL BELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medicomp, Inc. v. Gallivan
as 6:2021cv02129
Plaintiff:
Medicomp, Inc.
Defendant:
Nickol Conklin Gallivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55370
Plaintiff:
NICKOLOUS DWAYNE MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICKOL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25902
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NICKOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
