Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SCHIPPEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SCOTT SCHIPPEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11221
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64938
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SCOTT HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46484
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SCOTT DENHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters et al v. Phillip Scott Management Investments, LLC
as 8:2017cv02099
Plaintiff:
Abigail Peters and Rachel Peters
Defendant:
Phillip Scott Management Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Hibbard et al
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Phillip Scott Hibbard, Katherine Inglett, Hugh Hibbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
USA v. Phillip Scott, Jr.
as 12-11651
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP SCOTT, JR.
Dyess v. Barrow County Detention Center et al
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Phillip Scott Dyess
Defendant:
Barrow County Detention Center and R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyess v. Christy et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Phillip Scott Dyess
Defendant:
Christy and Highfill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyess v. Barrow County Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Phillip Scott Dyess
Defendant:
Barrow County Detention Center, Medical Staff and Registered Nurses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
